The post How can you reduce autoclave cycle time? appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>When an autoclave becomes a bottleneck in the laboratory, adding a second unit may seem like the obvious solution. But limited capacity is not always the real problem. In many cases, long cycle times are responsible for the low throughput.
Before investing in another autoclave, it is therefore useful to understand where the time within each cycle is actually being spent.
An autoclave cycle consists of several stages, including heating, air removal, sterilization, cooling and, depending on the application, drying. The validated sterilization phase should not simply be shortened to save time. Instead, improvements should focus on the stages surrounding it.
Depending on the load, significant time may be spent on:
Identifying which of these stages is limiting throughput is the first step towards improving autoclave efficiency.
Rather than assuming which part of the process is responsible for long cycles, examine actual cycle data.
Modern autoclaves can record process information such as temperature, pressure and cycle duration. Reviewing several representative cycles can reveal whether most of the time is being spent during heating, sterilization, drying or cooling.
It is important to look at multiple cycles rather than one particularly slow run. Ideally, evaluate cycles over a representative period and compare different load types.
For example:
Once the slowest stage has been identified, improvements can be targeted much more effectively.
Air inside an autoclave is one of the factors that can interfere with efficient steam sterilization.
For sterilization to occur effectively, steam needs to reach the surfaces and materials being processed. Air pockets can reduce steam contact and make it more difficult for parts of the load to reach the required conditions.
This is particularly relevant for loads such as:
Gravity-displacement or free-steaming processes remove air by allowing incoming steam to gradually displace it from the chamber. This can be suitable for relatively straightforward loads, but more complex or porous loads can make air removal more difficult.
A pre-vacuum system actively removes air before the sterilization phase. This can improve steam penetration and help the load reach the required sterilization conditions more uniformly.
If cycle records show that air removal and heat-up are consistently slow for porous, wrapped or complex loads, the air-removal method is therefore worth investigating.
Drying is particularly important for wrapped instruments and porous materials.
A load may have completed the sterilization phase successfully while still containing residual moisture. For wrapped sterile materials, excessive moisture can make the load unsuitable for storage or immediate use and can increase the risk of contamination after removal from the autoclave.
Drying should therefore be treated as a distinct part of the cycle rather than simply an extension of sterilization.
Depending on the autoclave configuration, drying performance can be supported by:
Vacuum helps remove steam and moisture from the chamber, while chamber heating can provide the energy required for remaining moisture to evaporate.
For laboratories processing substantial quantities of wrapped or porous materials, drying performance can have a considerable effect on both cycle duration and overall throughput.
Liquid loads behave differently from instruments, glassware and other solid materials.
The chamber itself may reach the selected sterilization temperature before the liquid inside a bottle or container does. Larger liquid volumes can take considerably longer to heat throughout.
For this reason, the temperature of the chamber alone does not always indicate that the entire load has reached sterilization conditions.
Some autoclaves can use a load or reference probe positioned inside a representative container. The sterilization hold then begins according to the measured load temperature rather than relying solely on chamber temperature.
This approach can help ensure that the sterilization period starts at the appropriate point without unnecessarily extending every cycle to compensate for the slowest possible load.
Steam generation also influences how quickly an autoclave can reach operating conditions.
Depending on the autoclave design and installation, steam may be generated using:
An integral steam generator produces steam specifically for the autoclave and can support rapid steam availability between cycles. However, whether this improves throughput in practice depends on the existing system, load types and available utilities.
If a large proportion of cycle time is consistently spent reaching operating temperature, the steam supply and heating configuration are worth evaluating.
For liquid sterilization, cooling can represent a substantial part of the total cycle.
Large bottles and dense liquid loads retain heat for a long time. They also cannot always be depressurized or cooled rapidly without considering the risk of boiling, container breakage or liquid loss.
Different autoclave configurations can use technologies such as:
The appropriate cooling method depends on the type of containers, liquid volume, load configuration and process requirements.
If liquid cycles dominate the laboratory workload, reducing cooling time safely may provide a greater improvement in throughput than modifying another part of the cycle.
The programmed autoclave cycle is not the only factor affecting daily throughput.
Consider the complete period between one load entering the autoclave and the next load starting. Additional time may be lost through:
In a busy laboratory, relatively small delays between cycles can add up to a substantial amount of unused capacity over the course of a day.
Improving workflow around the autoclave may therefore increase throughput without changing the sterilization process itself.
Optimizing cycle time does not mean that a second autoclave is never necessary.
Additional capacity may be justified when:
However, if one particular cycle stage is responsible for most of the delay, addressing that stage may be more effective than immediately adding another machine.
Before changing the autoclave configuration or investing in additional equipment:
Reducing autoclave cycle time is not about shortening sterilization conditions simply to make a cycle faster. Sterilization parameters must continue to meet the requirements of the load, process and applicable validation procedures.
Instead, laboratories can look at the stages surrounding the sterilization hold.
For wrapped and porous loads, air removal and drying may deserve particular attention. For liquid loads, heating and cooling can be more significant. In other laboratories, steam availability or simply the workflow between consecutive runs may be the limiting factor.
Understanding where cycle time is actually being spent makes it possible to target improvements where they have the greatest effect, and to determine whether additional autoclave capacity is really necessary.
Explore our autoclaves here
The post How can you reduce autoclave cycle time? appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post Why are sterilized loads still wet after autoclaving? appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>A successful autoclave cycle does not necessarily mean that every load is ready for immediate use. For wrapped instruments, textiles and other porous materials, sterilization is only part of the requirement. The load must also leave the autoclave sufficiently dry.
Residual moisture can compromise the integrity of wrapped sterile packs after they leave the autoclave. This makes drying an important consideration when selecting an autoclave for porous and wrapped loads.
Achieving both effective steam penetration and reliable drying typically depends on three closely related features: a vacuum system, a heated chamber jacket and an appropriate steam supply.
Air removal is essential for effective steam sterilization. Steam must come into direct contact with the surfaces being sterilized, and trapped air can prevent this from happening.
This is particularly important for loads such as:
In a simpler gravity-displacement autoclave, incoming steam gradually displaces the air inside the chamber. This can be suitable for certain types of loads, such as open glassware, but wrapped and porous materials present a greater challenge because air can remain trapped between layers or inside the load.
A vacuum autoclave actively removes air from the chamber before sterilization. Pre-vacuum stages help evacuate trapped air so that steam can penetrate the load more effectively.
Vacuum therefore plays an important role in achieving reliable sterilization of loads that are difficult for steam to penetrate.
Vacuum can also be used after the sterilization phase.
Once the sterilization hold has been completed, the load still contains heat and moisture. As the chamber and load begin to cool, remaining steam can condense on or inside the materials.
A post-vacuum stage helps remove steam and moisture from the chamber and load before this condensation becomes a problem.
However, vacuum alone does not necessarily provide sufficient drying. The chamber must also remain warm enough for residual moisture to evaporate effectively.
This is where the chamber jacket becomes important.
A chamber jacket surrounds the sterilization chamber and helps maintain its temperature during the drying phase.
Rather than introducing additional steam directly into the chamber, the jacket supplies heat through the chamber wall. This helps residual moisture evaporate while reducing the risk of steam condensing again as the load cools.
The combination of vacuum and heat therefore addresses two different parts of the drying process:
Vacuum removes moisture and steam from the chamber, while the heated jacket provides the energy needed to evaporate remaining moisture.
For wrapped and porous loads, these functions work together to improve drying performance.
A heated jacket requires a suitable source of steam.
Depending on the autoclave installation, this may come from an integral steam generator built into the autoclave or from an external steam supply available within the facility.
An integral steam generator allows the autoclave to generate the steam required for both sterilization and jacket heating without depending on a central steam system.
The exact configuration depends on the autoclave design and the utilities available at the installation site.
Explore our steam generator here.
For applications where wrapped or porous loads need to leave the autoclave sterile and dry, vacuum, chamber heating and steam generation should not be considered completely separate features.
They form part of the same process.
Before sterilization, vacuum removes air that could prevent effective steam penetration.
During sterilization, saturated steam provides the conditions required for sterilization.
After sterilization, vacuum helps remove steam and moisture from the load.
During drying, the heated chamber jacket maintains the temperature needed to encourage remaining moisture to evaporate.
Together, these stages allow an autoclave to handle loads that require more than a conventional sterilization cycle.
A vacuum autoclave does not have to be used exclusively for wrapped instruments or porous loads.
Depending on the autoclave configuration and available programmes, the same system may also be used for other common laboratory applications, including glassware, certain liquid loads and the decontamination of laboratory waste.
Different load types should, however, be processed using appropriate cycles. A wrapped instrument load has very different requirements from a bottle of liquid or a container of contaminated laboratory waste.
Modern laboratory autoclaves can therefore offer multiple cycle programmes designed around different load types rather than requiring one cycle to accommodate every application.
For laboratories with high throughput, it may be useful to divide work between different autoclaves rather than purchasing two identical systems.
For example, a vacuum-equipped, jacketed autoclave can be reserved for wrapped and porous loads that require its additional capabilities, while a simpler autoclave handles routine glassware, liquids or waste.
Whether this is appropriate depends on the laboratory’s workload, load types and required throughput.
The important point is to specify autoclaves according to the loads they actually need to process rather than assuming every application requires the same configuration.
Wrapped instruments are generally processed using a cycle specifically designed for porous or wrapped loads.
Such a cycle can include:
The exact temperature, sterilization time and drying parameters depend on the load, applicable procedures, equipment and validation requirements.
For example, some wrapped-instrument cycles operate at approximately 134°C with relatively short sterilization hold times, while other applications use different time-temperature combinations.
Waste and liquid loads require different cycle conditions and should be processed using programmes appropriate to those materials.
The type of loads processed in the laboratory should be the starting point when selecting an autoclave.
A vacuum-equipped system should be considered when routinely sterilizing wrapped instruments, textiles or porous materials where trapped air could interfere with steam penetration.
It may also be appropriate when loads need to leave the autoclave dry and ready for subsequent handling or storage.
If an existing autoclave regularly produces damp wrapped packs, this can also indicate that the machine or cycle is not configured appropriately for the load being processed.
In these situations, simply increasing the sterilization time does not necessarily solve the underlying problem. Air removal, moisture removal and drying performance all need to be considered.
The distinction between sterilization and drying is important when evaluating autoclave performance.
Sterilization is concerned with achieving the required conditions throughout the load for the specified period. Drying is concerned with removing residual moisture afterwards while maintaining suitable conditions inside the chamber.
For straightforward laboratory loads, a simpler autoclave configuration may be sufficient. Wrapped and porous loads place additional demands on the system because both steam penetration and subsequent moisture removal become critical.
Understanding the roles of vacuum, chamber heating and steam generation therefore makes it easier to specify an autoclave according to the actual application rather than selecting features in isolation.
For laboratories processing a variety of load types, the most suitable configuration ultimately depends on what is being sterilized, how it is packaged and whether the load must leave the chamber dry as well as sterile.
Explore our autoclaves here
The post Why are sterilized loads still wet after autoclaving? appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post Mistakes when storing samples in freezers and refrigerators appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>Sample integrity depends on more than setting a temperature to −20 °C and closing the door. Temperature excursions, poor sample placement, inconsistent defrost cycles, and inadequate monitoring can put stored samples at risk in analytical, clinical, and biobanking laboratories.
A freezer failure can compromise valuable samples and affect the reliability of long-term studies or regulated work. This post covers the most common storage mistakes, good storage practices, and monitoring approaches that can help detect problems before they lead to sample loss.
| Mistake | Consequence | Best practice |
| Wrong storage temperature | Sample degradation | Match temperature to sample type |
| Repeated freeze-thaw | Sample degradation | Aliquot samples |
| Overloaded freezer | Temperature gradients and slow recovery | Stay below the recommended capacity |
| Poor monitoring | Missed excursions | Use continuous independent monitoring |
| Frequent door openings | Slow temperature recovery | Organized inventory |
Laboratory sample storage failures are commonly associated with:
A failed −80 °C freezer holding a biobank of plasma or tissue samples cannot simply be replaced with fresh material. Many samples represent unrepeatable time points, from clinical trial baseline samples to environmental samples tied to a specific collection date. ISO 20387 provides requirements and guidance for managing risks and maintaining the quality and integrity of biological material in biobanking, including the control of storage conditions.
The financial impact can also be significant. A single ultra-low-temperature freezer may contain samples whose scientific or research value far exceeds the replacement cost of the equipment itself. This makes sample storage more than a technical issue: reliable storage and monitoring are also important for quality management, traceability, and compliance.
One of the most common mistakes is applying a single storage temperature to sample types with different stability requirements. Storage conditions should be selected based on the sample type, its intended use, and validated storage requirements.
Using the same storage temperature for all nucleic acid samples can increase the risk of sample degradation. RNA generally requires more stringent storage conditions than DNA, so storage recommendations should be based on the sample type, stability requirements, and intended application.
Repeated freeze-thaw cycling is an important source of sample degradation. Each cycle can cause physical and chemical changes that affect sample integrity, including protein denaturation, loss of biological activity, and degradation of some nucleic acids. The impact depends on the sample type, storage conditions, and number of freeze-thaw cycles.
Some proteins, antibodies, and other sensitive analytes can be affected by repeated freeze-thaw cycles, while others are relatively stable. The common mistake is storing an entire sample in one vial and repeatedly thawing and refreezing it for sequential testing. A better approach is to prepare appropriate aliquots before initial freezing, so individual portions can be thawed when needed without repeatedly exposing the entire sample to temperature changes.
The appropriate aliquot volume depends on the sample type, test requirements, and expected use. Smaller, single-use aliquots can help minimize unnecessary freeze-thaw cycles and preserve the integrity of the remaining sample.
Manufacturers specify recommended loading capacities and operating conditions for laboratory freezers and refrigerators. Exceeding these limits can restrict airflow, reduce temperature uniformity, and extend temperature recovery after door openings.
Overloading can also make it more difficult for the unit to maintain stable conditions throughout the storage space. Temperature differences may occur between different locations within the chamber, particularly when airflow is restricted or when the unit is frequently opened.
For this reason, laboratories should follow the manufacturer’s recommended loading capacity and avoid blocking vents or airflow paths. Samples should also be organized to allow adequate air circulation and minimize unnecessary door openings. Temperature mapping and independent monitoring can help identify areas where storage conditions are less stable.
Every time an ultra-low-temperature freezer is opened, warm ambient air enters the chamber and the internal temperature can fluctuate. The time required to return to the target temperature depends on factors such as the freezer design, duration of the door opening, ambient conditions, and how frequently the unit is accessed.
In high-traffic laboratories, frequent door openings can increase temperature fluctuations and make it more difficult for the freezer to maintain stable storage conditions.
Common contributing mistakes include:
Organizing samples by frequency of use and maintaining an up-to-date inventory can reduce unnecessary door openings. For laboratories with frequent access requirements, equipment designed for high-access workflows may also help limit temperature fluctuations.
Relying solely on a freezer’s built-in temperature display can leave laboratories without sufficient warning of storage problems. The displayed temperature may not represent conditions throughout the entire chamber, and a failure of the freezer’s control or monitoring system may not provide an independent warning.
Effective monitoring generally includes:
Not all areas within a freezer or refrigerator provide the same storage conditions. Temperature differences can occur between locations in the chamber, particularly when airflow is restricted or when the unit is frequently opened.
Frost-free refrigerators and freezers use automatic defrost cycles to prevent ice buildup. These cycles can cause temporary temperature fluctuations, which may be unsuitable for certain temperature-sensitive samples. Laboratory-grade units designed for stable storage conditions may use different defrost systems, including manual defrost, depending on the equipment and application.
A frequent mistake is storing temperature-sensitive reagents, particularly enzymes and antibody conjugates, in a general-purpose frost-free unit intended for consumer or office use rather than a laboratory-grade unit designed for the required storage conditions.
The appropriate equipment depends on the sample type, required temperature, and intended use. Laboratories should follow the manufacturer’s recommendations and the validated storage requirements for each sample.
Power interruptions can put stored samples at risk, particularly when freezers or refrigerators cannot maintain their required temperature for an extended period. Many laboratories only discover gaps in their backup planning when an outage occurs.
Common oversights include:
The appropriate backup solution depends on the equipment, sample type, storage temperature, and expected duration of the interruption. Laboratories should establish contingency plans in advance and review them regularly.
Storage failures are not always thermal. Illegible or non-standardized labeling, inconsistent barcode systems, and undocumented sample relocations can lead to lost or misidentified samples even when temperature control is adequate.
ISO 15189 addresses sample identification and traceability in medical laboratories, including the identification of samples throughout the examination process. Laboratories should therefore maintain clear identification procedures and ensure that sample locations remain traceable.
A related mistake is failing to maintain a digital inventory map showing the exact freezer, shelf, rack, and box position of each sample. Without an accurate inventory, staff may spend more time searching for samples, increasing door-opening frequency and handling risk.
A well-organized inventory helps laboratories locate samples efficiently, reduce unnecessary freezer access, and maintain traceability throughout the storage lifecycle.
Reducing storage-related sample loss comes down to applying a consistent set of good storage practices. Match the storage temperature to the specific sample type rather than relying on a facility-wide default. Aliquot samples when appropriate to limit freeze-thaw exposure, avoid overloading units beyond their recommended capacity, and use independent temperature monitoring with appropriate alarm notifications. Follow the manufacturer’s recommendations for defrosting, and maintain a documented and tested contingency plan for power failures.
None of these measures is complex individually, but together they help maintain stable storage conditions and protect samples throughout long-term storage.
A practical prevention checklist includes:
Consistent storage practices can help preserve sample integrity, reduce the risk of sample loss, and support reliable analytical results over the lifetime of a sample archive.
Explore our freezers here
Explore our refrigerators here
The post Mistakes when storing samples in freezers and refrigerators appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post What is a freeze dryer and how does it work? appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post What is a freeze dryer and how does it work? appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post How to clean a laboratory balance? appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post How to clean a laboratory balance? appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post Common mistakes when using a laboratory incubator appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post Common mistakes when using a laboratory incubator appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post Sterilization based on your load type appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post Sterilization based on your load type appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post How to prevent contamination in the lab appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post How to prevent contamination in the lab appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post How to achieve accurate weighing in your lab appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post How to achieve accurate weighing in your lab appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post How to stay safe with your Chemical Fume Hood appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>The post How to stay safe with your Chemical Fume Hood appeared first on LabSPX.
]]>